// Compare
Lightfield vs Ahoy
Lightfield and Ahoy are after the same problem: a CRM that captures everything and does the work, so the team can sell instead of doing data entry. Both are AI-native. Both record and analyze calls at the entry tier. Both keep a human in the loop before agents act. This is a comparison between two credible answers, not a takedown.
The difference is the angle of attack. Lightfield is built around the meeting - recorder, transcripts, prep, and agents that work from conversation history. Ahoy is built around the pipeline - agents watch event signals across email, calls, and meetings, reason about what should happen next, and prepare the action for your one-tap approval. Where Lightfield remembers everything, Ahoy is organized around what to do about it.
Who should pick which?
Choose Lightfield if…
- You're an early-stage team whose selling lives in meetings, and you want the recorder at the center of the workflow
- You need HIPAA readiness (their Pro tier)
- You want outbound sequence delivery - their Growth tier carries it
- You want a self-serve trial today; Ahoy is in early access
Choose Ahoy if…
- You want pipeline-first prioritization - the next best action surfaced, prepared, and ready to approve
- You want agents that watch signals beyond the meeting - email, calendar, and engagement, not only conversation history
- You're scaling past early stage - granular roles, multi-workspace, and portfolio reporting carry Ahoy into the mid-market
- You prefer a CRM that plans and strategizes alongside you, not only one that records
How do Lightfield and Ahoy compare on features?
| Lightfield | Ahoy | |
|---|---|---|
| Built to | Remember - meeting-first capture that drives the work | Act - pipeline-first agents prepare next steps |
| Automatic data capture | Emails, meetings, conversations captured; records auto-created and updated | Emails, calls, and meetings captured; records updated automatically |
| Call intelligence | Included from Startup - native recorder, transcription, prep | Included from Startup |
| Agent model | Agent proposals, tasks, and notes - propose-then-approve | AI-prepared tasks, one-tap approval, guardrails by default |
| AI usage limits | Unlimited agent queries and actions | Unlimited agent queries and actions |
| Configurable data model | Configurable; custom objects on Pro | Fully configurable; custom objects on Pro |
| Outbound sequences | Growth tier only ($2,000+/workspace/mo) | Proactive follow-up automation included |
| HIPAA readiness | Pro tier | Not listed |
| Multi-workspace / portfolio | Growth tier | Growth tier |
| Availability | Self-serve free trial | Early access waitlist, or request a demo |
How do pricing and packaging compare?
| Lightfield | Ahoy | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Published tiers: Startup $89/user/mo (monthly only) · Pro $249 annual · Growth $2,000+/workspace/mo | Per-seat, billed monthly or annually - request a demo |
| AI costs | Included, unlimited | Included, unlimited |
| Outbound sequences | Growth tier only ($2,000+/workspace/mo) | Included in standard plans |
| Onboarding | White-glove migration on Pro | White-glove onboarding on Pro |
| Free tier | No - self-serve trial | No - early access waitlist |
Lightfield details are from their public pages, June 2026. Check their site for current pricing.
Why do teams switch?
The pipeline is the point
Meetings are where deals are discussed; the pipeline is where they are won or lost. Ahoy's agents watch the whole board - engagement signals, stalls, commitments - and surface the action most likely to move revenue. Recording the conversation is table stakes; knowing what to do next is the job.
Signals beyond the meeting
Deals move between meetings: an email goes quiet, a calendar invite slips, a champion stops opening your messages. A meeting-first system sees those gaps late. Ahoy's perception layer watches the whole surface - email, calendar, calls, engagement - and prepares an action the moment a signal fires, not at the next recorded call.
Sequences without the workspace floor
Lightfield holds automated outbound delivery for its Growth tier at $2,000+ per workspace per month. Ahoy includes proactive follow-up automation in its standard plans, so smaller teams get leverage without a platform-sized contract.
Frequently asked questions
Are Lightfield and Ahoy basically the same product?
They share a thesis - AI-native, automatic capture, agents with human approval. They differ in center of gravity: Lightfield organizes around the meeting recorder; Ahoy organizes around the pipeline and the next best action. Which fits depends on where your selling actually happens.
How do the prices compare?
Lightfield publishes its tiers - $89/user/mo Startup (billed monthly only), $249 Pro billed annually, $2,000+/workspace Growth. Ahoy is priced per seat, billed monthly or annually; request a demo for current numbers. Neither product meters AI usage, so compare what each tier includes - Ahoy carries follow-up automation in its standard plans where Lightfield holds sequences for Growth.
Do both record and analyze calls?
Yes. Both include call recording, transcription, and analysis at the entry tier - unusual in a market where incumbents gate conversation intelligence to enterprise plans.
Can I migrate from Lightfield to Ahoy?
Yes. Contacts, companies, deals, and conversation history come with you, and the Ahoy team works through migration during onboarding. Request a demo and we will take a look together.
Is Ahoy available today?
Ahoy is in early access - join the waitlist or request a demo. Lightfield offers a self-serve trial. If trying something this afternoon is the deciding factor, that is a real difference.
More comparisons: Attio vs Ahoy · HubSpot vs Ahoy · Salesforce vs Ahoy · Zero vs Ahoy · Day.ai vs Ahoy · Ahoy plans